Sir Richard Mottram's famous words during the 'bury bad news' scandal have been going round and round and round my head:
"We're all fucked. I'm fucked. You're fucked. The whole department's fucked. It's the biggest cock up ever and we're all completely fucked."
This for the people who say protesting against the result is people complaining about democracy and they shd stfu. I understand you don't get it, there's lots not to get, but please, some sympathetic understanding would be much appreciated at this time!
This is a hastily written attempt to try and process what's happened over the last few days and explain what my current state of mind is and why.
It's been slightly weird watching everything unfold. Unfold's too neat. A vast undermining, slow collapse. Like Cameron and the political and media classes have been playing jenga and this was the piece that finally saw the whole shitshow come crashing down. Unexpectedly in Australia on business, I managed to scramble an emergency proxy vote with the help of my brother (thanks Jack) and a very efficient Lambeth Council (highest proportion of remain votes in the country i think UPDATE apart from Gibraltar). I think most of the experience has been fairly similar to people I know in the UK - watching the cascade of twitter with horrified, hypnotised fascination, too appalled to look away or take time out to breathe or find meditative space. What has been different is the fact that I've been experiencing it in solitude. Rhythms slightly out of whack with the UK news cycle, and frozen in daylight horror as the results themselves came out on Thursday night (my Friday). No one here gets it, understandably. They all think we're soft in the head, and are very surprised by the result. ('Aren't you?' 'No!'). People ask me how I feel about it and I answer angrily, shaking, 'I'm really fucking upset actually' and they look at me like I'm overdoing it, or am perhaps taking it a bit too hard. Overheard conversations by non UK people are even harder to take. Not that there's anything wrong with that obviously - they're talking about the news in another country - but there's a grind of correction, nuance and argument in my head, which only emphasises the specific elements of national sickness that have led us here.
It's inexplicable to everyone else. It's horribly believable to anyone with an awareness of Britain in recent... what... months? years? decades? All of it really.
How I feel hasn't changed much since that Friday - very sad, upset, sick, ashamed, and disgusted.
That all of the things that have taken place - all of them - were predicted beforehand, is just barbed wire to those emotions. And of course they were predicted in places I go to - my particular bubble on social media, friends, colleagues - but not, as far as I could tell to the extent that I still consume conventional media, on TV or in the newspapers particularly. After all this is part of the reason why I no longer read newspapers or watch TV news. Both generally come across as superficial to the point of negligence, if not downright mendacious. But nevertheless the available expert opinion of people who worked in sectors that would be affected (finance, education, telecoms, constitutional law, the civil service) all agreed that a vote to leave the EU would represent a national catastrophe. The very worst people were running the Leave campaign. Poisonous chancers who persistently showed they had NO PLAN. None. This still staggers me. There was very evidently no post-brexit policy - that could be seen even or especially in the main media outlets. There really is no excuse for anyone with even half their wits and a modicum of interest in politics not to have seen this coming.
But ok, yes, to process it. This does happen, despite the prolonged, appalled mental paralysis. Like a waking nightmare where you can't move but awful things are happening around you. Obviously there have been a shit load of articles to read and things to watch - so much of everything everwhere, as one person put it - but a handful of things I've read have resulted in my current state of mind.
The first, importantly, and despite its unhelpful headline, is this:Why the North of England Will Regret Voting for Brexit It's important because the 'fucking racist proles'/'stupid, uneducated idiots' line and its rose-tinted John Harris reverse is completely unhelpful, and is also the fissure that's attempting to be bridged by the 'I understand your concerns' line that so many pols on the left and right so feebly tread.
Looking at the most Eurosceptic areas in the North as an example, Hartlepool lost £28.9m by 2015 as a result of public spending cuts; Blackpool has seen £400m worth of cuts since 2011; North East Lincolnshire needs to save a total of £76m by 2017. In these towns, like my own hometown of Knowsley in the North West, the high streets are dead, the libraries are shut, Sure Start centres don’t exist anymore, NHS waiting times are long, jobs are scarce, wages are low and benefits have been cut. All the while, the cheap migrant labour coming in to fill low-paid precarious positions expanding under the recession becomes far more obvious. These areas aren’t just in crisis; they’re also, unlike their metropolitan neighbours, totally unused to high levels of historical migration and less equipped to culturally absorb recent arrivals.This is the late-game position of the Thatcher-Blair-Cameron continuum. No wonder those communities are sick of EU neoliberalism no matter how it manifests itself. Neoliberalism - a saturation of wealth for the wealthy, a favouring of the odds to the already favoured, with the trickledown tap shut off to not even a parched drip - has fucked them. Unfortunately, as they pointed over at Crooked Timber:
The context of the referendum meant that it was always going to be a choice of evils: between the racism and bigotry that animated so much of the Leave campaign, and the neoliberalism of both the Cameron government and the EU. The option of a social democratic, or even soft neoliberal, EU was not on the ballot.And it's hard to see how it could have been. After all it's not just not an option on the ballot. Oh and btw, add ultraneoliberalism to racism and bigotry there. This article was interesting:
Democracy isn’t just fairer than other systems of governance, it’s smarter. It leads to better decisions and better outcomes, on average and over the long run, than countries that are run by autocrats or councils of wise men with jobs for life.
One way to think about the vote is that it has forced a slightly more equitable distribution of anxiety and alienation upon the country. After Thursday, I feel more insecure about my future, and that of my family. I also feel like a foreigner in my own country — that there’s this whole massive swathe of people out there who don’t think like me at all and probably don’t like me. I feel like a big decision about my life has been imposed on me by nameless people out there. But of course, this is exactly how many of those very people have been feeling for years, and at a much higher level of intensity. Democracy forces us to try on each other’s clothes. I could have carried on quite happily ignoring the unhappiness of much of the country but I can’t ignore this.The whole piece does ignore the fact that the referendum never needed to be held in the first place, and in fact there are different types and structures of democracy designed to allow the execution of policy without having to hold a referendum for every decision. However, it did briefly have me flirting with the heresy of accelerationism. Put it this way, a victory for Remain feels like it would have been only a postponement, a repression of the things we've seen unleashed with such venom since Leave won. Farage's pre-election comment that if the vote went to Remain 48-52 it wouldn't be the end of matters didn't feel like it just signified Farage's stance but also significant sections of the media and English population. It doesn't feel like it would even have had its intended result of a put-up and shut-up for the Tory party, let alone for a disaffected, disenfranchised and media-goaded set of people. A catastrophic collapse might bring about a point confrontation sooner where we are required to re-assess how we have distributed wealth in this country over the last three and a bit decades, rather than perpetuating it with ever worse and more horrible results. But of course that's not at all how it works. Things are likely to get a lot worse for the already badly off and unhappy sections of society. This is an acceleration only to a point where things are likely to get very much more shit much faster without any compensating reverse in the political trends of the last thirty years. Marxist praxis if not theory, and accelerationism by extension, has been characterised as being millenarian at base - if the right circumstances are in place the process of history will ensure a completed state of ahistory. There is a bottom to raw capitalist or neoliberal mode beyond which we cannot go, beyond which, in fact, things start to redistribute. But our current state feels better characterised by Shakespeare and King Lear. There is no bottom to it, just madness, loss and slaughter. Just before I came out I was reading Empson on the English notion of the 'dog', a reassuring concept, outside of religion, not part of the Platonic chain of being, imputing a certain amount of human affection to the lowest a human could go.
Whereas Shakespeare felt that "there is no worst", and the corresponding depths to him were fearful degrees of lunacy; "fool" was his earth touching word, not "dog".This prompted the thought that by some Boris Johnson is seen as a 'dog', cheerful, bit dodgy, bit of a 'ledge', bit of #bantz (and god help us all, some of the recent epileptic spasms of racism do seem to be in places partly, grotesquely characterised by #bantz). But no, Johnson is the fool, he is representative of folly, and folly, as Blake pointed out, is the cloke of knavery, and presiding absently over this chaos is the utter knavery and incompetence of our political establishment. So yes, Boris as fool in Lear. And there for propriety's sake the analogy must stop. So, no, there is no relief in the idea of accelerationism - even if there is a bottom, it's not a place worth reaching under any circumstances. Tom Ewing's bitterly enjoyable A-Z tumblr post, Obsolete Units Surrounded by Hail (!) was particularly handy codifying the strands of brexiteers:
There are the blue rinsers — Tory heartland Eurosceptics, mostly now quite old, motivated by dreams of British exceptionalism and an ancient tribal cause. There are left-behind Labour — mainly in the north of England, Midlands,and Wales, motivated by their belief that immigration has inflamed the pressures of austerity. There is the Far Right, racists who hated immigration in the first place. Those are the biggest groups. Then there are also the leftists voting for “Lexit” (motivated by dislike of the EU’s implementation of neoliberalism), the Gove-ite ultra-neoliberals (motivated by dislike of the EU’s non-implementation of neoliberalism), and last and frankly also least the tiny rump of original UKIP, genuine sovereignty wonks like Alan Sked.Useful, because as can't be said enough these groups do not share anything beyond "Out". And, again, can't be said enough: politicians used and provoked the inflamations of the old Labour heartlands for their own purposes. As one tweet exchange had it: 'If no credible plan emerges soon, Brexit voters may wonder if they have voted merely for the ambition and hollow vanity of their leaders.' Response: 'But that's exactly what they voted for'. Right now, it seems likely the Leave ringleaders, and indeed everyone else scrambling for a plan, are going to try and find a way to remain as much in Europe as possible. Let's say we become a member of the European Economic Area (EEA), paying higher fees than we paid to the EU, but with very few of the funding benefits. We would also have to allow free movement of people. Oh but no EU veto, against Turkey, say, if that bothers you. So it's like being in the EU, but a lot worse, and without any power. Probably the best of all the bad outcomes. But of course this is an outcome that divides them against many people whose support they courted. And, so, the racist whiplash. Bad, horrible now, but when it becomes apparent that immigration control is not and was never on the cards for any sort of economically interested politician, likely to become far worse. This is racism, but where 'racism' rightly includes a wide spectrum of prejudice against races, colours, countries and creeds, this racism needs to be distinguished by the social thuggery and violence, both incoherent and programmatic, which exists sub-politically, but has been tacitly, even explicitly encouraged by vocal parts of the media and political establishment, and thus resembles the early stages of Western European fascism. The most disgusting thing listening to Cameron's call for calm the other day was the recent memory of the most careless, casual statement of his careless, casual tenure, where he referred to a 'swarm of people coming across the Mediterranean'. A statement from our head of government that legitimised years of Express and Daily Mail front page rhetoric. Tom Ewing's horribly right to highlight the future of the Calais internment camp - all I find I get in my head are images that resemble Larkhill resettlement camp in V for Vendetta. Even in terms of the people supposed to protect the interned, let alone those who wish to do them harm, our track record of private security firms running immigration holding centres - most notoriously at Yarl's Wood - is characterised by sexual violence, suicide, hunger strikes, and reports of children being kept in 'extremely distressing conditions'. The use of immigration as a target for that pent-up generational economic disenfranchisement has resulted in and legitimised racism. A thwarted, worse-off section of society, with immigration as its catnip, and the apparent expectation in some places of repatriation of foreigners, can hardly be expected to respond positively to an outcome that makes things worse without any perceived benefit. A handful of other things (because there is just too much of everything):
Johnson and Gove carried with them a second feature of unscrupulous journalism: the contempt for practical questions. Never has a revolution in Britain’s position in the world been advocated with such carelessness. The Leave campaign has no plan. And that is not just because there was a shamefully under-explored division between the bulk of Brexit voters who wanted the strong welfare state and solid communities of their youth and the leaders of the campaign who wanted Britain to become an offshore tax haven. Vote Leave did not know how to resolve difficulties with Scotland, Ireland, the refugee camp at Calais, and a thousand other problems, and did not want to know either.
1. My thoughts as a Northern Irish person on how NO LEAVERS REALISED that Brexit will likely precipitate utter carnage in NI and, thusly, UK 2. I'm angry that the NI point is never, ever discussed. Despite the fact we are (a) the only people who have a land border w EU... 3. (b) simultaneously the only part of UK for which a border would prove uniquely, and dramatically problematic... 4. (c) since we overwhelmingly voted for Remain because of the previous two reasons. So there's that. But it gets worse. It gets much worse. 5. The fact is that either they put a militarised border between North and South or all their talk of Fortress Britain is nonsense. 6. A fully open border EXISTS between the UK and the EU; one such example is my dad's back fence; a 15 second walk from ROI and thus the EU. 7. You're French. You travel freely via EU to Dublin. Get bus to Lifford (3 hrs). Walk for 90 seconds to Strabane. Ta-da! You are now in UK 8. No border checks, no machine guns, no "papers please". Just open. This is no longer acceptable to the mandate we have just been handed. 9. A border is bad for practical reasons; people like my sister live in Donegal and work in Derry, and thousands more vice versa... 10. MUCH MORE IMPORTANT are the psychological effects. Lot of Good Friday Agreement predicated on free movement between north and south. 11. This and cross-border bodies were just enough to comfort nationalists but not close enough to a united Ireland to antagonise unionists. 12. Actually, an awful lot of the framework of the GFA was underpinned by existing EU laws anyway, so it may now be entirely undone. 13. But more importantly, making people undergo any form of border checkpoint between the two countries will not just be an arse ache.. 14. ... will massively inhibit the sense of security half of NI population takes from it and ROI being part of a wider European state. HUGE. 15. I want to stress that this not a new concept for us. I'm 30, so I remember checkpoints as a kid. I remember machine guns and dogs. 16. My dad making sure we weren't nervous while he was being asked patronising questions by the armed men inspecting his driving license... 17. ..and checking under our car forexplosives. This used to be EVERY FUCKING DAY. 18. This won't be some new, weird thing - this will be a direct, unbidden return to something we worked very, very hard to get away from. 19. Something that we were promised was over. That we finally thought we HAD gotten away from. 20. A notion of peace that thousands of very stubborn and dangerous people finally struck a peace for. Put down arms and moved on from. 21. A long process of peace, to which we must presume thousands of people now alive in NI and mainland UK, literally owe their lives. 22. And now we see violence could sleepwalk back in as a SIDE EFFECT of Brexit. One that no one ever mentioned in any debate I watched. 23. The Troubles, back as A SIDE EFFECT of a tussle for the leadership of the Conservatives, a party NI citizens don't even fucking vote for. 24. REMEMBER: Irish-Identifying NI citizens (I don't like saying 'Catholics') risk now being physically cut off from Eire. That is DRAMATIC. 25. Vast majority are not hardened, violent. Same was true in 60s-80s. It takes an angry minority, w a "legitimate" grievance to recruit. 26. The recklessness of not appreciating this powder keg AS EVEN A FUCKING TALKING POINT IN THE DEBATES disgusts me. 27. I identify as Irish (and have Irish passport) but am happy for NI to remain part of UK if majority say so; and we have peace, stability. 28. Same is true of LARGE percentage of Irish-Identifying NI people. But free travel to Eire is part of that peace, part of that stability. 29. As is the HUGE amount of cash the EU gave us in peace dividends. (€3.5bn from EU in last round of budgeting). 30. But at least English people (and Welsh too - wtf lads???) can strike a blow against bendy bananas. [SLOW HAND CLAP, SOBBING] END.